Gorilla Journal 35, December 2007

News from the Cross River National Park

The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) is presently conducting a study of the villages in Cross River National Park's Okwangwo Division enclaves and the immediate vicinity, to find out where and when gorillas disturb human farming. For a comparison, I visited the northern outreach of Afi Mountain and a community forest belonging to Kakwagom Irruan, where crop raiding incidents by gorillas have been recorded recently during dry seasons. Demand for farmland due to increasing population pressure is high here, and plantations extend far up the mountain.
My team and I walked from Butatong to Obudu Cattle Ranch in 10 days and in each village we assembled the communities and held discussions about the damage inflicted by both small and large mammals in the local plantations. What we have found so far is:

  • Except for Okwangwo all communities have seasonal visits by gorillas during the dry season when food and water resources are less abundant in higher elevations.
  • A much greater problem during all seasons is the damage done by small mammals.
  • Among larger mammals wild pigs (red river hog) are responsible for more damage than any primate.

The levels of education and awareness in the area are rising and there seems to be no immediate threat that primate hunting will become socially accepted again in the near future. Still, among the communities there is a good deal of worry concerning matters such as transportation and the availability of medical treatment. Cash crops were introduced by different NGOs, but it is very difficult to convert them into money since there is no road for vehicles, and alternative forms of livelihood are needed. If this does not happen, the situation concerning gorillas may change radically. For the enclave villages (Okwangwo, Okwa 1 & 2) the urgent question is whether the communities should be relocated or whether they will continue to struggle for a more practical living in their present location. If these villages' activities continue to increase, the national park will be cut in half and, essentially, cease to function effectively.
The possibility of having a protected area with several groups of gorillas ranging freely within it is a real hope for the future!

Conclusions Concerning Crop-raiding Gorillas
After trekking from Butatong to Obudu Cattle Ranch in September, I continued with my team in early October to the Bumaji villages, where the situation in many respects is similar to that of the enclave (Okwangwo, Okwa 1 & 2) and Balegete villages; destruction of crops is mainly due to every day damage by small mammals and red river hogs. Gorillas are irregular dry season visitors but have a lot of harmful consequences for individual farmers because of their destruction of banana and plantain plants, when they do appear.
In Bumaji two incidents of recent (last 5 years) killings of gorillas were acknowledged during discussions with farmers in the community. The local residents are generally inadequately educated on gorilla/primate behaviour and the killings have supposedly happened because farmers (or women collecting bush mango) felt physically threatened. Obviously such killings may occur for economical motives, or for food/protein, even if this was not actually admitted during interviews. I did not attempt to find out more about these incidents since it could evoke unnecessary tension, and it was not the primary aim of my research.
Compared to areas visited earlier, the Bumaji villages apparently have a rather negative relationship to the national park; their main concern is the exclusion of 7 villages (Bakufiko, Bakie, Bagabo, Uno, Bago, Bamariko and Bumfua) from being support-zone villages, a concept which is supposed to include all villages within 5 km of the national park border. According to park ranger Samson Akabo, the support-zone villages scheme (a concept left over from the creation of the national park that no longer receives major funding) is still functioning and occasional money is handed out, through the national park, to villages included in the scheme for road maintenance and scholarships. It is also from support-zone villages that most national park personnel are employed. The exclusion of these particular Bumaji villages apparently induces less respect for the national park and nature conservation, and it may be a major threat to present non-hunting policies and future biological abundance.
I concluded my visit in Bumaji with a survey of gorilla evidence in the upper Mache area, with the intention of comparing to data collected by WCS in March 2007 that found 79 gorilla nests in 5 days. The March report further mentioned that (according to local residents) there should be more evidence of gorilla presence in October. I spent 2 full days with two park rangers and two guides from the village of Yagwebe, resulting in 36 gorilla nests being identified. Considering the amount of time spent surveying, it was a marginal difference: 18 nests per day in October compared to 15.8 nests in March. No primates was seen or heard by anyone in our team during our 2 days hiking in/out and 2 days surveying.
My report concerning gorilla damage on crops will indicate what kind of habitual range the species presently occupies. The national park was spatially constructed in a hasty manner by using old colonial forest reserves without taking time to include all ecological aspects. A review of borders in the Okwangwo Divison is urgently required for the Cross River gorillas to receive their desperately needed sanctuary.

Survey team, Mache   Survey team, Mache. Photo: Patrik Norberg

View of Bumaji Valley   Bumaji Valley. Photo: Patrik Norberg

Patrik Norberg

Patrik Norberg is concluding two Masters degrees in Sweden, one in ecology for which he did specific fieldwork in the Cross River District, and one in African Studies that concern conservation in West Africa.

Cross River overview

Homepage